From 9547b6357887030f3ca10c879311d27d092df095 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brendan Bartels <bbartels@iastate.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:05:31 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] website: cleaning up

---
 website/content/cli.md                 | 4 +---
 website/content/wifi_latency_update.md | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/website/content/cli.md b/website/content/cli.md
index cd0489a7f..9ee9475da 100644
--- a/website/content/cli.md
+++ b/website/content/cli.md
@@ -10,6 +10,4 @@ One of our objectives on the Ground Station was to develop a command line interf
 <figure>
 <img src="images/cli.png">
 </figure>
-</a>
-
-We can already see basic functionality in their CLI, as well as reliable error handling with the command parser.
+</a>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/website/content/wifi_latency_update.md b/website/content/wifi_latency_update.md
index 33f2db545..9c7be281f 100644
--- a/website/content/wifi_latency_update.md
+++ b/website/content/wifi_latency_update.md
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Title: Wifi Latency Testing
+Title: Wi-Fi Latency Testing
 Date: 2016-09-22
 Authors: Brendan
 Category: Highlights
@@ -14,4 +14,4 @@ David took up the challenge to test a promising solution using Wi-Fi instead of
 </figure>
 </a>
 
-He tested communication with both UDP and TCP protocols, but more importantly the one-way latency for both protocols was far less than our bluetooth setup, with most of the wifi latency distrubtion falling below 20ms.
+He tested communication with both UDP and TCP protocols, but more importantly the one-way latency for both protocols was far less than our bluetooth setup, with most of the WiFi latency distrubtion falling below 20ms.
-- 
GitLab